Structuring for Success: How a SaaS Founder Unlocked €40,000 in Total Grants Through Strategic Setup

Julien D. builds software that helps logistics companies track and report their fleet emissions. By late 2025 his product had paying pilots in France and Belgium, a waiting list in Germany, and a legal setup that no longer fit: a French micro-entreprise held together by invoices and goodwill.
A proper company was overdue. What he did not know was that the way he set it up would decide which public funding he could ever apply for.
The starting point
Julien's first instinct was the obvious one: pick a fiduciaire, send the documents, get a company number. Three quotes later he had three different prices for the same paperwork and no answer to the question he cared about: which structure keeps me eligible for Luxembourg's startup aid?
That question landed with us in a 15-minute intro call. It changed the order of everything that followed.
Structure before paperwork
Most founders choose a legal form first and discover the funding landscape later. We work in the opposite direction. Before anything was filed, we mapped Julien's roadmap against the programmes he could realistically claim in his first two years, then worked backwards to the setup those programmes expect.
Three decisions did most of the work:
- Timing. Several early-stage aids are reserved for first-time creations. Registering the company before signing the German contracts kept that door open.
- Activity description. The company's stated purpose was written so his development work reads as what it is: innovation, not consulting. That wording follows a company into every application it ever makes.
- Substance. A Luxembourg address, a local bank account and properly documented capital, because every granting authority checks the same basics first.
From first call to filed company
The formation itself ran as a checklist, not an adventure. Business permit application, notary appointment, RCS registration, bank account, VAT number: each step prepared in advance, and each document checked for completeness by licensed Luxembourg partners before it went anywhere official.
Julien kept selling through all of it. His total time in meetings across the whole setup came to less than a day.
The funding stack
With the structure in place, the applications followed in sequence rather than all at once, each one building on the file created by the last.
- Primo-création, the support for first-time business creators, contributed €12,000.
- Fit 4 Digital added €5,000 towards digitalising his customer onboarding.
- SME Packages co-funded 70% of two eligible consultancy projects.
- The EUIPO SME Fund reimbursed part of his EU trademark costs.
Stacked over his first year, the four programmes came to €40,000 in confirmed support. None of it cost him equity.

"I expected a paperwork service and budgeted for one. What I got was a sequence. Every structural choice from week one showed up again in a grant application by month six."
Julien D., founder
Where things stand
The company now invoices in three countries from one Luxembourg entity. The grant money went where it was designed to go: two hires brought forward by half a year, and an EU trademark that would otherwise have waited.
The €40,000 is the headline. Julien's own summary is the better measure of the work: the structure has not needed a single correction since the day it was filed.
€40,000
in confirmed support, stacked over the first year
4
public funding programmes, applied for in sequence
0%
equity given up: grants, not investors
About this story: Julien's case is an illustrative scenario. It exists to show how our structuring process applies Luxembourg's real funding programmes to a typical founder journey. Programme amounts are the officially published figures, and every award decision rests with the granting authority. No funding outcome can be promised in advance.
